Jump to content

Niall

Administrators
  • Posts

    9,392
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Niall

  1. wth is betch

  2. slutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslutslut

  3. skankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskankskank

  4. Wankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwankwank

  5. I am taking your visitor message virginity. Hope you enjoyed that :p

  6. An outdoors venue Hyde Park or Knebworth would be good, with capacities of 50k and 80k respectively it'd make more sense if they kept future UK gigs to venues of this size. I know that would then prohibit using an identical stage setup as an arena tour but using an adaptable one would mean they could play venues that had a capacity that better matches demand for tickets. Trouble is Muse's album cycles always mean tours start during the Autumn when outdoors venues are problematic as it gets dark and cold too early.
  7. I can't confirm in the same way management could but I'm almost certain it is!

  8. Also email Muse management to make them aware of your dissatisfaction with the shop provider.
  9. With so much awesome stuff in their username I expect JessMuseCullenPattison23 is already well aware of this. I probably deserve an infraction for that.
  10. Well, if you read the Muse Collectors sticky the details are all in there. And I shall merge this thread up there now
  11. Yeah sounds dodgy indeed, they were only every in black.
  12. Thanks! I was hoping for some original journalism and a studio visit, shame it's just regurgitated stuff.
  13. Jeez why are some of you trying to give us such a hard time about this? We're trying to do the best we can with the somewhat vague guidelines management have told us to enforce and some of you are intent on causing as many problems as possible for us. In these sorts of cases we're trying to be as reasonable as possible, but if it comes down to it we'll err on the side of caution and that means tighter restrictions on what can and cannot be posted in threads like these. Please use some common sense so we don't have to come up with overly restrictive or complicated rules and start more heavily policing these threads.
  14. I think there's a very clear distinction between photos of just Kate/talking about Kate/surreptitious paparazzi photos and photos with both her and Matt posing at a widely publicised event where they have essentially opted in to having photos taken. It's not much different than if she came with Matt to the NME awards or something and was in all the photos taken of the band. This is the Oscars we are talking about, not speculative magazine columns and opportunist photos of them grocery shopping. If management say otherwise we'll take them down but I see know harm in having these specific photos here where they both knew they were coming to a paparazzi and media laden event where they would be expected to pose.
  15. I wouldn't worry too much about that really. There is no know mechanism through which a dream could predict such a thing, nor is there anything know in nature that could facilitate such a thing.
  16. Yeah, I was uncertain at first about the placement here since it seemed a firmly KnT thread to me but we're giving it a try, it's very easy to reverse should it not work out after all.
  17. Ah okay, fair enough. Thanks. I was just wondering if I was missing something I didn't know about. I'm rather happy with my Sennheiser PX200s. £30 for headphones with a greater range than my ears are capable of detecting seemed reasonable. I've heard so much about skullcandy headphones breaking. You'd think using sturdier materials wouldn't change the overheads too much but ah well. Although saying that the high end response on the in ear ones doesn't seem too bad for the in ear ones.
  18. I know popular audio equipment is often bad, would anyone be able to explain why to me? I've never really understood it. I'm a physicist so feel free to throw jargon at me.
×
×
  • Create New...