Hat 24 Posted September 5, 2011 Nobody said anything was wrong with the original. What's wrong with different takes/variations? If that's what they want to do, and they do it well, I am all for it.I don't think that's what will happen though. I think the said remastering is of the live performance of OoS. But the point is that you can't get such a vastly different album with a new master. To re-record the songs would make a lot more sense. Remaster does imply that there's something wrong with the master, otherwise it's just fishing for money. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WutDaFucksy 10 Posted September 5, 2011 On another note, I hope they don't do a 360 thing as the only way to watch the performances. The Wembley one lags so much I can barely hear the songs. I'd rather just see Liam's edit. This this this! No offence, but may I ask why you would buy a remastered version? What is wrong with the mastering of the original? I'd just like to hear how different they sound, and who said about buying? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hat 24 Posted September 5, 2011 I'd just like to hear how different they sound, and who said about buying? I doubt that they would sound much different at all tbh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WutDaFucksy 10 Posted September 5, 2011 Hmmm Just think it's interesting to hear it that's all, knowing the band they'd replace Darkshines with them clapping over a toilet or something Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IamtheUniverse 10 Posted September 5, 2011 God if they rerecorded OoS, unlike the usual 'remastered edition' bollocks you get, which sounds virtually exactly the same. I think it would sounds 500x better. OoS is their best album but I prefer the way they sound overall now. A DVD/Blu Ray would be awesome from a stadium gig or with the towers. And the track listing was good. No one ones to see Neutron Star Collision or Guiding Light. Wembley 2nd night would be too good to hope for to be honest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hat 24 Posted September 5, 2011 Hmmm Just think it's interesting to hear it that's all, knowing the band they'd replace Darkshines with them clapping over a toilet or something But that's the point, what you just said has nothing to do with remastering. That's re-recording or reproducing. Remastering is basically improving sound quality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IamtheUniverse 10 Posted September 5, 2011 But that's the point, what you just said has nothing to do with remastering. That's re-recording or reproducing. Remastering is basically improving sound quality. And from what I can tell, it barely does that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Minimal 10 Posted September 5, 2011 (edited) Remastering is basically improving sound quality. Used to be. Nowadays I try to avoid remastered albums as the tracks are usually compressed to hell on purpose to make them loud and commercial. They sound like crap and have no emotion. On another note though, Muse have gotten rid of Rich Costey after BHAR and Resistance does sound good (at least when compared to BHAR) so I am optimistic about a Remastered OoS. Edited September 5, 2011 by Minimal Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WutDaFucksy 10 Posted September 5, 2011 But that's the point, what you just said has nothing to do with remastering. That's re-recording or reproducing. Remastering is basically improving sound quality. Well I don't care. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mjartrod 10 Posted September 5, 2011 No one ones to see Neutron Star Collision or Guiding Light. Wembley 2nd night would be too good to hope for to be honest. i could do without guiding light but i've seen NSC live and i loved it. and although i was at wembley (2nd night), i was gutted that i couldnt go to the first night, as i missed IBTY. *shrugs* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Larry. 10 Posted September 5, 2011 I'd love to hear a re-recorded version of OOS. I much prefer Matt's singing, and the overall sound of the more recent albums... It's just a shame the songs aren't as good Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
futurellama 10 Posted September 5, 2011 otherwise it's just fishing for money. ...exactly. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Minimal 10 Posted September 6, 2011 It's just a shame the songs aren't as good Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hat 24 Posted September 6, 2011 ...exactly. Muse would never do that Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dee3Dee 10 Posted September 6, 2011 Muse would never do that Ha ha ha. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spectrum IV 14 Posted September 6, 2011 Ha ha ha. Is it sad that I saw only this post, and somehow knew it was about money? About the OoS re-record... rather than looking back at how good they once were, I'd rather they took influence from the album, and channeled it into making a kick-ass sixth album. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dukelion 10 Posted September 6, 2011 All this talk seems quite far-fetched. Origin of Symmetry has sold (in the UK since application date) at exactly 652,779 in this moment in time, since it came out. To me, their live material is probably going to make their label more money than a re-release. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IamtheUniverse 10 Posted September 6, 2011 All this talk seems quite far-fetched. Origin of Symmetry has sold (in the UK since application date) at exactly 652,779 in this moment in time, since it came out. To me, their live material is probably going to make their label more money than a re-release. They'd both sell the same, all of the fans would buy it, but everyone will just think it's another pointless re-release. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hat 24 Posted September 6, 2011 They'd both sell the same, all of the fans would buy it, but everyone will just think it's another pointless re-release. Trust me, all the fans would not buy a re-release of OoS(unless it's re-recorded). Not even close. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dukelion 10 Posted September 6, 2011 Trust me, all the fans would not buy a re-release of OoS(unless it's re-recorded). Not even close. Exactly. I work in the industry, and "for the fans" is a statement you never really hear as that's a very niche market. Its all about "how much is it going to shift". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IamtheUniverse 10 Posted September 6, 2011 I think you misunderstood, or I miss typed. I meant Origin of Symmetry live from Reading or whatever, and a re-record would sell the same. Re-release - nothing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dukelion 10 Posted September 6, 2011 I think you misunderstood, or I miss typed. I meant Origin of Symmetry live from Reading or whatever, and a re-record would sell the same. Re-release - nothing Ah right yeah that makes more sense Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hat 24 Posted September 6, 2011 I think you misunderstood, or I miss typed. I meant Origin of Symmetry live from Reading or whatever, and a re-record would sell the same. Re-release - nothing Well you DID say re-release, not re-record Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IamtheUniverse 10 Posted September 6, 2011 Well you DID say re-release, not re-record Yeah, and I said it wouldn't sell, which it wouldn't. Re-recording, would be much more successful or the live release. Either a re-record or a live release of OoS, would be....... quite good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hat 24 Posted September 6, 2011 Yeah, and I said it wouldn't sell, which it wouldn't. Re-recording, would be much more successful or the live release. Either a re-record or a live release of OoS, would be....... quite good. Ah, quite right. But as Haze said, tI very much doubt that they would release anything now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
