Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 You can't hear arpeggio synth in every song. (Except Muse of course... but that's a different story) Guitar is a whole other matter of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 You can't hear guitar in every song. Oh damn your guts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabriPav Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Oh damn your guts. I could answer with your avatar but that would be what you'd expect from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 I could answer with your avatar but that would be what you'd expect from me. I would never expect you to surprise me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiT Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 You can't hear guitar in every song. Haha you are crafted. But the topic was arpeggio synth and space rock connection in the first place. And what you are doing is the usual word twisting going into tiny details. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 When most synths have a function actually built in specifically for arpeggios, I think it's fair to say it's pretty common. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Haha you are crafted. But the topic was arpeggio synth and space rock connection in the first place. And what you are doing is the usual word twisting going into tiny details. What you're doing is to avoid all arguments against you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabriPav Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Haha you are crafted. But the topic was arpeggio synth and space rock connection in the first place. And what you are doing is the usual word twisting going into tiny details. I'm word twisting now? Wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiT Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 What you're doing is to avoid all arguments against you. But that statemenet that arpeggio synth has nothing to do with space rock is just wrong. Actually that's one of the characteristics of space rock. I stated many examples as well. And the other stuff you guys are talking about "other genres use it as well" is irrelevant because the point was the connection between space rock and arpeggio synth in the first place. Got it?: D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 But that statemenet that arpeggio synth has nothing to do with space rock is just wrong. Nobody has made such a statement. The point is that arpeggio synths do not create space rock, and that they're a characteristic of the genre is just wrong. Pink Floyd did fine without it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabriPav Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Actually that's one of the characteristics of space rock. This is the wrong part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiT Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Nobody has made such a statement. The point is that arpeggio synths do not create space rock, and that they're a characteristic of the genre is just wrong. Pink Floyd did fine without it. Then what the hell is this?: D What in gods name do arpeggios have to do with space rock. ______________ This is the wrong part. To rephrase it: can be one of the charasteristics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Then what the hell is this?: D A question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiT Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 A question. Nobody has made such a statement. Are you fucking are right now?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Are you fucking are right now?? Come again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiT Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Come again? wanted to be "fucking around" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Come again? Can't you read? He asked if you are are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 wanted to be "fucking around" I'm not going to carry on an argument with you if you don't even know the difference between a question and a statement. Take up a course on logic, you need it. Can't you read? He asked if you are are. But I'm am not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiT Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 I'm not going to carry on an argument with you if you don't even know the difference between a question and a statement. Take up a course on logic, you need it. But I'm am not. lol. You are terribly wrong. You said nobody stated that arpeggio synth and space rock doesn't have anything in common. But Sippe did. Yes, it was a question. "What in gods name do arpeggios have to do with space rock." Study this sentence. The meaning of that question was that he thinks there's no connection. How else would you like me to explain it to you? Incredible ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 lol. You are terribly wrong. You said nobody stated that arpeggio synth and space rock doesn't have anything in common. But Sippe did. Yes, it was a question. "What in gods name do arpeggios have to do with space rock." Study this sentence. The meaning of that question was that he thinks there's no connection. How else would you like me to explain it to you? Incredible ... Statements are declarative, which rules out the possibility of their being questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiT Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Statements are declarative, which rules out the possibility of their being questions. Jesus christ. That's not the point. You can't even explain the main arguement. Just hide behind the grammar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 Jesus christ. That's not the point. You can't even explain the main arguement. Just hide behind the grammar. I'm trying to teach you logic, which might in the end help you create a comprehensive argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiT Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 I'm trying to teach you logic, which might in the end help you create a comprehensive argument. I'm still waiting for your explanation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 I'm still waiting for your explanation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopix Posted August 25, 2013 Share Posted August 25, 2013 It was a question, but more of a rhetorical one in which Sippe carried an opposing statement. No one is saying arpeggio synths have nothing or all to do with 'space rock,' just that they are used (sometimes) in it, which is indisputable. And Fabri, all you do is word twist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.