Georgieboy Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I'm currently researching for my A2 media critical Investigation and as a keen fan I'm trying to find out whether in recent years the media have been responsible for a more commercial representation of muse to thier fans? Do you beleive this to be true? If so isit a good or bad thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarrieB Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I'm currently researching for my A2 media critical Investigation and as a keen fan I'm trying to find out whether in recent years the media have been responsible for a more commercial representation of muse to thier fans? Do you beleive this to be true? If so isit a good or bad thing? I can't give an complete overview as I haven't followed Muse long enough, but I get the impression that the media have always been involved in giving Muse a commercial representation which may or may not be in line with who they really are. If you look at the early interviews in the collection edition of NME, they're quite sensationalist and paint Muse in quite a dark way, I suppose in fitting with their earlier music. More recently they're painted as sci fic, crazy and bombastic. I don't know how much of that is to do with Muse changing or with how the media sees them changing, but I noticed the shift, having got to know Muse in more recent years and then reading the old interviews. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nohopeinfear Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Warner have alot to do with it tbh. Before 2006, Muse didn't generally "whore" themselves to the media, but since Warner, they've reached a point where "commercial" is more a necessity than a goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haze015 Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Muse have always been a commercial band and been played on radio, TV as well as performing on a variety of TV shows since their first album and were on prime time shows by OOS. Nothing charts just for being "good". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clunge Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Muse have been what you might want to call a 'commercial' or 'mainstream' band since Showbiz. They've had massive radio hits, grown steadily from a small club band to massive stadium act and have seen their music feature in a number of huge film franchises. However, it must be said that since Muse signed a long term deal with Warner in 2005 (...?), they've certainly become far far far more visible and accessible to a much wider audience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nohopeinfear Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 However, it must be said that since Muse signed a long term deal with Warner in 2005 (...?), they've certainly become far far far more visible and accessible to a much wider audience. Yeah that's what I was trying to say Before Warner, it was a rare treat to see Muse in a magazine, let alone the cover, now they're bloody everywhere, it's not a bad thing, it's just sometimes, too much of a good thing can make you tired of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haze015 Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Muse have been what you might want to call a 'commercial' or 'mainstream' band since Showbiz. They've had massive radio hits, grown steadily from a small club band to massive stadium act and have seen their music feature in a number of huge film franchises. However, it must be said that since Muse signed a long term deal with Warner in 2005 (...?), they've certainly become far far far more visible and accessible to a much wider audience. Why else sign with a major? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nohopeinfear Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Why else sign with a major? This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clunge Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Why else sign with a major? Exactement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaabuum Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 I think Twilight saga has to do a bit with that. But hell yeah, some songs are really commercial.Uprising's cool, but really commercial. Anyway, I get an orgasm when I listen/play(on my guitar) Knights of Cydonia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jyrgen Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Yes they are, but that's not bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caff Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Before Warner, it was a rare treat to see Muse in a magazine, let alone the cover, now they're bloody everywhere, it's not a bad thing, it's just sometimes, too much of a good thing can make you tired of it. IDK...I have lots of issues of NME and Kerrang/etc pre-2006 that have Muse on the cover or at least a big feature to do with Muse. Oh and Rocksound, I have the Absolution era issue of that with Matt on the cover looking a bit weirder than usual. In terms of TV commercial exposure...there infamous L&K appearance was 2001. Personally I do recall them getting a lot more TV/radio exposure once OoS was out compared to Showbiz but even with that album they made it onto TOTPs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mozza Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 IDK...I have lots of issues of NME and Kerrang/etc pre-2006 that have Muse on the cover or at least a big feature to do with Muse. Oh and Rocksound, I have the Absolution era issue of that with Matt on the cover looking a bit weirder than usual. In terms of TV commercial exposure...there infamous L&K appearance was 2001. Personally I do recall them getting a lot more TV/radio exposure once OoS was out compared to Showbiz but even with that album they made it onto TOTPs. I remember New Born and Bliss being on Radio 1 a lot in 2001 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seregon Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 This thread has been done a million times and the answer is always yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopix Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 Wow guys, I'm surprised at you. I wasn't expecting serious and sensible discussion! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WutDaFucksy Posted September 9, 2010 Share Posted September 9, 2010 It's funny how with Warner the music has deteriorated (yes, it is my opinion) slowly. But what does it matter to Warner? The band on their label is selling out stadiums all over Europe! They could release an album of Matt doing a fart and it would sell well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davinq Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Yes they are. This hardly warrants a discussion. /thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoosier_muser Posted September 11, 2010 Share Posted September 11, 2010 Yes, I'd say they're now commercial, at least, they are definitely far more commercial now than they were, say 10 years ago. The Muse we see now with the huge stage shows and the LED suits are a far cry from the Muse that were introduced to us all with Showbiz. They seem to have lost their "underground" "unique" edge over time and they're far more accessible to the mainstream now than they were when Matt was performing songs like "Micro Cuts" and smashing the stage up with his (non-Manson) guitar. But it happens to most musical artists--you sign with a major label, you get exposure in film and television, and you become "commercial". While it may not be a bad thing, it does end up changing the artist in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Novus Dies Posted September 11, 2010 Share Posted September 11, 2010 I'm currently researching for my A2 media critical Investigation and as a keen fan I'm trying to find out whether in recent years the media have been responsible for a more commercial representation of muse to thier fans? Do you beleive this to be true? If so isit a good or bad thing? When weren't they commercial? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Born Lee Posted September 13, 2010 Share Posted September 13, 2010 Wow guys, I'm surprised at you. I wasn't expecting serious and sensible discussion! I think this wouldn't be the case if the OP wasn't doing research or seeming to actually need answers, as opposed to the countless pointless speculators in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.