Grinning Death Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 2 Kilos of Nepalese Kush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faptdivers Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 That`s so strange , you`d put that in a guitar?I`d light it and shove it up my whammy +2 octaves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheddatom Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Slighty, but not compeltely OT am I the only person in the world who barely uses his volume pot? I don't really play guitar amped up. My bass has an active pre-amp with volume controls for each pup, so yeh I do play with them but that's more like a kind of tone control. When you turn your volume pot down , it cuts treble like a deranged butcher in a slaughterhouse. And trust me , an output buffer inside a guitar makes a huge difference. If you use a long cable (3-6m) without one you lose alot of definition and treble (the cable basically acts as a resistor). Depending on the buffer circuit, it could make a huge dfference to your tone, but not necessarily a good one. A buffer in a pedal at the end of a 10m cable is perfectly acceptable. You're basically telling me that if I instead connected to the pedal with a 1 foot cable, or directly wired the output of my guitar to the input of the pedal with a few inches of wire, I would suddenly hear a massive increase in treble. Bollocks! A buffer after your cable is fine. Anyway, my question was this: Is there a significant loss of high frequencies when using a volume pot instead of going straight to the jack? If so, why don't they use volume pots which when on full output match the response of going straight to the jack? I always thought leaving it on full was like bypassing it, but maybe not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simno Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 I don't really play guitar amped up. My bass has an active pre-amp with volume controls for each pup, so yeh I do play with them but that's more like a kind of tone control. Yeah I occasionally take it down a notch or two to change the tone, but most of the time it's full on because the guitar simply sounds a hundred times better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phill Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Yeah I occasionally take it down a notch or two to change the tone, but most of the time it's full on because the guitar simply sounds a hundred times better! I only use mine to clean things up sometimes by rolling a little off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simno Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 I only use mine to clean things up sometimes by rolling a little off. Phill where can I find plentiful pictures of your axes? Hugh is starting work on my new one in a week weeeeeeeee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don'tPostThePear Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Anyway, my question was this: Is there a significant loss of high frequencies when using a volume pot instead of going straight to the jack? If so, why don't they use volume pots which when on full output match the response of going straight to the jack? I always thought leaving it on full was like bypassing it, but maybe not. let's take a 250k vol and 250k tonepot. Both maxxed, they have a 250k ohm resistance "against" ground. Their combined resistance is even lower, they are in parallel so that is like having a 125k resistor going to ground, correct me if i am wrong. Now let's take a guitar pedal. Most of them are made with 1000k ohm (1Mohm) input impedance resistors cause anything less would make treble loss. According to this i would say that the pots cause treble loss. I made that bypassable tone pot mod, which makes my guitar a bit brighter even when the tone pot is maxxed. Nothing else happened to the sound so that makes the whole guitar tone cap a bit bullshit like. (i have a orange drop in there, i like the bypassed sound more) So why don't they use 1 or 2M pots? Because their taper is so bad that maybe you should turn your pots after halfway until something happens to the sound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheddatom Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Why can't they make a 2M pot with a decent taper? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil. Posted July 23, 2010 Author Share Posted July 23, 2010 Why can't they make a 2M pot with a decent taper? why not make your own taper then? the easiest is to do it with a linear pot. you just put resistors between the lugs and you can have it at whatever taper you want. if you want to be even more precise, get a 5M pot and you can make it, for example, a 3.8M Reverse Audio 68% taper if you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don'tPostThePear Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 Why can't they make a 2M pot with a decent taper? 'cause they don't care about us our treble loss:( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheddatom Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 I'm just wondering WHY not how to make one. In high end Hi-Fis, what do they use for the volume pots? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faptdivers Posted July 23, 2010 Share Posted July 23, 2010 It`s funny you ask , I was just reading about that the other day. Really interesting stuff here Cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phill Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 Phill where can I find plentiful pictures of your axes? Hugh is starting work on my new one in a week weeeeeeeee sweet!! the flickr page linked in my sig has a bunch, there's a few on facebook and if you want any others give me a shout and i can take some for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impulse 101 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Ahhh. What do you gain by bypassing the tone and volume, compared to having the tone and volume all the way up? The volume and tone have a significant effect on the sound of the electronics. They steal level and you loose a bit of high end too. JT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simno Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 sweet!! the flickr page linked in my sig has a bunch, there's a few on facebook and if you want any others give me a shout and i can take some for you. Looking wicked man, I love the finish on the headstock of the cracked mirror, looks bloody epic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grinning Death Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 That`s so strange , you`d put that in a guitar?I`d light it and shove it up my whammy +2 octaves. It's all about the tone. I smoke in front of a fan, it gives me blow backs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phill Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Looking wicked man, I love the finish on the headstock of the cracked mirror, looks bloody epic! Cheers mate! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don'tPostThePear Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 I'm just wondering WHY not how to make one. In high end Hi-Fis, what do they use for the volume pots? stuff like this http://www.alps.com/WebObjects/catalog.woa/E/HTML/Potentiometer/RotaryPotentiometers/RotaryPotentiometers_list1.html notice how 100k is the biggest. Or digital volume controllers. I have some of those digital potentiometer ICs, if i remember well i have never saw any of them being bigger than 100k. Also they are a bitch to program compared to an arduino. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheddatom Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 so then, if big enough pots don't exist, there are pots in your amp's pre-amp which will reduce hi end by just as much, or if you have a volume control in your guitar, the limitations of the pots in your pre-amp will not be heard, because they're happening in your guitar. So, what i'm saying is, there will always be at least 1 pot in your chain, cutting out this majical top end, so how come cutting out your guitar's volume pot, as opposed to your pre-amp's volume pot, makes so much difference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don'tPostThePear Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 buffered or amped signals won't loose highs somehow if the vol. pot is after the buffer/gain/drive etc. stage, but this is black magic area for me with impedance and stuff. So you can use a 5k pot as a volume pot with a hifi amplifier you won't loose your delicious 50Khz audiophile high-end response. This is interesting: http://tangentsoft.net/audio/cmoy-tutorial/misc/cmoy-tangent-sch.pdf There is a 10k vol. pot. at the input which looks quite low and a 100k res. to ground which is quite low again. But this stuff is fed by line-in signal, so it gets amped stuff. So i would say that the difference between pickups and audio signals is that the pickups signal is pretty low/weak or something so it is more affected by the pots but i don't really know what is the exact reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bliss_Saturday Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 I dunno I've been ruining about getting a digitech whammy, I haven't heard much on them though... Then I thought I'd like MIDI strips as well.... I dunno I'm just confused. Any thoughts on nice, fairly heavy distortion that's good for tapping and such like new born solo tapping sorta? Any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edmunn Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 12 band EQ could be handy, maybe a knob for Envelope Filter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheddatom Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 I dunno I've been ruining about getting a digitech whammy, I haven't heard much on them though... Then I thought I'd like MIDI strips as well.... I dunno I'm just confused. Any thoughts on nice, fairly heavy distortion that's good for tapping and such like new born solo tapping sorta? Any thoughts? This post is amasing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phill Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 Couldn't agree more! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cheddatom Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 what's the name for one of those pictures of most commonly used words? Maybe it's one of them from KnT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.