Jump to content

haze015

Members
  • Posts

    13,615
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by haze015

  1. Thanks guys!

     

    Yeah, I need to have a look at the "production" side of things, because I know nothing about that stuff. I do keep -9 db headroom on Traktor to keep everything nicely out of red. I guess adding a limiter would be possible using Audacity? Anyways, really need to have a look at that.

     

    Added a new set today. It's mostly improv, but turned out surprisingly well aside from one sloppy transition. It's chill house with longer transitions and no droppage. https://soundcloud.com/juusoko/no-meds-just-chill-house

     

    Nah, if you're clipping when in Traktor, it'll be clipped no matter what you do in Audacity afterwards.

    Not a good idea to be adding limiting or even lighter compression to a lot of modern music, need to start getting vinyl rips for that sort of thing.

  2. No idea about Tracktor as I tend to use Ableton (Although not really done any DJ'ing for at least a year, need to get back on it) and stick to a -12dB rule and stick a limiter on the master. Having that sort of headroom allows for vinyl recordings to be mixed in with modern brutally mastered stuff.

     

    Some nice tunes there though!

  3. Hey Haze!

    No plugins, just straight into my 8-track

    The lead is three voices in unison with some delay; decided as an aesthetic choice to 'exceed headroom' in the recording as a kind of sonic counterpoint to the rest of the piece which is just organ, bass and another little flute synth

     

    Real tape! :D I like what its doing to the sound, just felt it could be a touch less distorted, which is bizarre for me. I actually make use of an old Fostex 4-track on my band's new single: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAi27zIvVcs Love these things so much.

  4. Very 70's, had me thinking of a more cheery and sped up version of Magic Fly by Space. If that's a tape saturation plugin you're using for the distortion on the synths, would use it more subtly than that.

  5. Like you said, both tracks need to be the same volume to eliminate placebo effect. Is there a better technique than normalising?

     

    My understanding is that vinyl artifacts might interfere with the peaks etc. and make the vinyl result quieter.

     

    Not really, would need to be involved right through the entire process/have access to all that to truly conduct a scientific test.

     

    Not sure what you're trying to say there about vinyl. If vinyl interferes with transients/peaks, then it is either compressing or distorting them, the former allowing for more gain and the latter will add harmonics, increasing the perceived volume.

    Vinyl has difference characteristics to digital/tape, so what is required for loudness is different. Things like the shorter the track, the louder the record can be.

  6. Haze will correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure you need to normalise both tracks to the same volume before you can compare the two.

     

    You need to make sure how loud you are listening to them is 100% the same, which is very difficult to do

     

    What do you mean by normalising? Its usually used to raise/increase gain to a desire peak level, so wouldn't necessarily make them the same perceived level.

  7. Same speakers i used for a while. I'm not saying vinyl is better than CD, i don't think so. I'm just saying the Muse CDs are compressed and artificially louder. I'm not an expert but maybe these vinyl rips have a different master or don't have the loud process, can't really tell, just hear the differences.

     

    You need to make sure how loud you are listening to them is 100% the same, which is very difficult to do. Even a 1dB difference can make something sound "better", when really, its just louder. Also vinyl impacts a very subtle distortion on the sound, its frequency dependant and different from traditional distortion, adding more character, which adds more complexity in comparing the two. Vinyl rips may have gone through amplifiers, which again, may add colour to the sound, rather than 100% clean.

     

    Everything involved with music production is artificial. Vinyl will involve a lot of compression, especially with low end, but also helps bring up subtle details that would otherwise be lost with the limited dynamic range, just doesn't look like they've gone as far as clipping an A/D converter (It wasn't compression), which they did with the CD master. But the differences are not huge (Although the software you're using doesn't have dB meters, just numbers, which is useless) and are not necessarily perceptible.

     

    Never trust what you see image wise, plus there are plenty of example of double blind testing with the same material where people are convinced they could hear a difference. Its difficult to make something sound worse than the BH&R CD though.

  8. Can't tell if trolling. I'm going to assume so.

     

    By saying all rock is better than pop, that's like saying Nickelback is better than Muse. I mean, Muse is pop, right? Pop rock? Genres suck.

     

    /MossFromITCrowdVoice

     

     

    Rock IS Pop!

×
×
  • Create New...