As the forum is closed I thought I could hopefully conclude this discussion here. Continuing from your last post...

You are mistaken; I never said you were wrong and I'm not arguing in favor of one side or the other; I'm simply arguing in favor of open-mindedness.

I choose to believe the side which I personally consider most likely to be true, based off research and judgements made by myself, but I'm open to the possibility that I might be wrong. Many of these conspiracies could be true; it's simply my personal judgement and opinion that they are unlikely.

What I mean to say is that I'm open to the possibility of these things in the same way I'm open to the possiblity of anything, but I will not believe things when there are arguments both for and against them. It is impossible to know with absolute certainty which side is right, and your claim of knowing the truth can not be taken with any more weight than the words of a person who says you're wrong.

It's like asking who's got it right - a religious man or an atheist? It's a judgement we have to make for ourselves. I'm neither a religious man nor an atheist, but rather a person open to all possibilities. I look at things not as "right" and "wrong", but as what I consider to be most reasonable and most likely at any given point in time.

Simply put, I presume nothing to be true, and I present nothing as truth beyond that which is undeniable fact.

I've never said these theories are wrong, I've simply said that they may not be true, and that's it's wrong to call them true and to tell other people they are true without possibly being able to know with absolute certainty.

My question to you is; do you admit you could be wrong?