Tofu Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 I knew there was another way, but I was just staring at it, like...what could this possibly mean? it's not my fault i'm so stupid Actually it IS your fault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Actually it IS your fault. Maybe her family frowns upon intelligence and knowledge. After all, she IS American. DON'T BE SO JUDGMENTAL, PEOPLE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlugInFuckingBaby Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Though, it really isn't my fault that I'm not British, that my American father chose to marry a Hispanic woman instead of someone of the British sort, and vice versa. All of this...from me not knowing the date of the times news XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LyraSilvertongue Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 I'm not even going to comment or argue with you guys! Though, it really isn't my fault that I'm not British, that my American father chose to marry a Hispanic woman instead of someone of the British sort, and vice versa. All of this...from me not knowing the date of the times news XD You just did Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom//P Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 I'm not even going to comment or argue with you guys! Though, it really isn't my fault that I'm not British, that my American father chose to marry a Hispanic woman instead of someone of the British sort, and vice versa. All of this...from me not knowing the date of the times news XD Don't worry, it's easy to be confused if you're not familiar with the different system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlugInFuckingBaby Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 You just did grr. Don't worry, it's easy to be confused if you're not familiar with the different system. scary thread. iz scary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 16-2010-05 OMG CONFUSE, which one is the year? WHICH ONE IS THE DAY? THERE AREN'T 2010 MONTHS, THIS DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaphod Chizzlebrox Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 16-2010-05 OMG CONFUSE, which one is the year? WHICH ONE IS THE DAY? THERE AREN'T 2010 MONTHS, THIS DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 What now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frakkles Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 What now? It's obvious. You're wrong because Chizzle doesn't like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trinity3music Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Would you mind terribly on your posts restricting yourselves to a lead paragraph only and asking people to click over to the Times in a new window? Everyone should know how to do that. Part of how these papers stay in business and bring you interesting articles about Muse is through advertising and page views. If you post the article in full and people do not read it on the site, then revenue goes down. I love Muse as well, but this is a big forum and lost page views really add up places like this. Please think about this. Thanks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sparky_ Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Would you mind terribly on your posts restricting yourselves to a lead paragraph only and asking people to click over to the Times in a new window? Everyone should know how to do that. Part of how these papers stay in business and bring you interesting articles about Muse is through advertising and page views. If you post the article in full and people do not read it on the site, then revenue goes down. I love Muse as well, but this is a big forum and lost page views really add up places like this. Please think about this. Thanks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlugInFuckingBaby Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Googoogee1 Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LyraSilvertongue Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 That's a very interesting addition to the discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melania13 Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Indeed, that poster is probably from such a publication so I do not see the reason for all the ":stunned:'s" Is it really that hard to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LyraSilvertongue Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Indeed, that poster is probably from such a publication so I do not see the reason for all the ":stunned:'s" Is it really that hard to understand? Apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayFan9876 Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 That's a very interesting addition to the discussion. Facial expressions mean more than words, don't they? In text form it would probably mean "K........ I'll get right on it...." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buxomflirter Queef Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Indeed, that poster is probably from such a publication so I do not see the reason for all the ":stunned:'s" Is it really that hard to understand? If Miss trinity3music had read the first post she would have seen 'and to read it online I had to register with their website' which why I assume the OP did not give a link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.