Dominic. Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 not found Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 and really? I thought it lacked treble? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord MFC Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 Try now and really? I thought it lacked treble? I meant all biting with loads of top end one of those nights when you say bubbles is in C standard when you mean half a step down, you know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 the mic one does sound a bit better, but it's not really much different anyway. But anyway that tone suits the New Born riff. Not so much Dead Star or a lot of other stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord MFC Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 But it sounds different Why cant you hear, Dom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord MFC Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 doesn't have all the horrible nasty SMBH wembleyness about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will_ Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 Still sounds a tad WET Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 But it sounds different Why cant you hear, Dom I said it sounds better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord MFC Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 I said it sounds better Good. When I get my good interface and mic ya'll see what I mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 Good. When I get my good interface and mic ya'll see what I mean When I get my blackstar I'll show you emulated output was your New Born FF as well? Maybe you should just lay off the FF... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord MFC Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 I thought I made it pretty clear that they were the exact same fx, exact same settings (except for the end of NB there's phase 90) I like the FF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 I like the FF. Maybe a bit too much. There's a bypass switch for a reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord MFC Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 Maybe a bit too much. There's a bypass switch for a reason Just have a clean sound then? I tend to use my distortion channel for certain stuff, like chords or melodic lines, but it's a tad dark for early muse riffs. In the room the FF sounds great. Gonna just say that again so you'll believe me. Or not. Whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kueller Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 Regular distortion works just fine for me for Muse riffs. But then I tend to keep it rather bright for that reason. Also I find that the emulated output tends to be a bit more of a bare representation of the tone. Kind of like putting your ear to the amp at its level. I've had times when I thought the tone from the amp was fantastic and then it didn't sound all that great when I recorded it through EO or with a mic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord MFC Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 Also I find that the emulated output tends to be a bit more of a bare representation of the tone. Kind of like putting your ear to the amp at its level. I've had times when I thought the tone from the amp was fantastic and then it didn't sound all that great when I recorded it through EO or with a mic. This! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 I'm not saying the emulated output doesn't have an effect on the tone! Obviously it does as you can tell from various people's personal accounts. What I was trying to point out originally was that Jamie's tone for dead star was gash and you can't really shift that on the fact it's EO. Dead star needs to be punchy, not all saturated and wet fartish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will_ Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 I've had one and only one experience with the Blackstar's EO. It sounded fucking shit might've been my settings as it was pretty soon after I got it, but nonetheless. Lost all the kick and bottom end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kueller Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 This! It's worth a check though. I have a setting right now that sounds good in both EO and just hearing from my room. So it's not always either or. Usually each method of hearing shows some flaw to fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord MFC Posted April 14, 2013 Share Posted April 14, 2013 I've had one and only one experience with the Blackstar's EO. It sounded fucking shit might've been my settings as it was pretty soon after I got it, but nonetheless. Lost all the kick and bottom end Indeed, hence why my Dead Star tone sounded "gash"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 I meant all biting with loads of top end Lost all the kick and bottom end Really, whatchu guys saying? and really? I thought it lacked treble? That's a Blackstar emulated output Gotta admit I do find this a little concerning as I can't quite afford a cab at the moment and was gonna rely on the emulated output for a while at least EDIT: If that reading is true then that is shocking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will_ Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 Really, whatchu guys saying? That's a Blackstar emulated output Gotta admit I do find this a little concerning as I can't quite afford a cab at the moment and was gonna rely on the emulated output for a while at least EDIT: If that reading is true then that is shocking Oh look at your little frequency analysis I GO WITH WHAT MY EARS HEAR BRUV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevmamen96 Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 Of course I just wish I knew more of the songs he's covered, that way I could enjoy his versions even more _AbsDtkQT3o 2:16 holyshit this is the best thing ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaicen Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 Oh look at your little frequency analysis I GO WITH WHAT MY EARS HEAR BRUV +1 QFT That frequency analysis means nothing. Show me an A-weighted frequency response with Log10 axis and we'll talk. To be fair though, most 'emulated speaker' outputs are just low pass filters, which is what that looks like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord MFC Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 Yeah, Music isn't maths Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kueller Posted April 15, 2013 Share Posted April 15, 2013 They do cross paths a lot though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.