FabriPav Posted December 25, 2013 Share Posted December 25, 2013 Were people using "remastered" when talking about video though? I always assumed they were talking about audio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted December 25, 2013 Share Posted December 25, 2013 I know what remastered means, and so do you. A lot if things get remastered when they're released to the public after some time, but people don't start labeling them remastered cause of some color correction or what not, cause It's a really minor thing. I don't remember anyone giving the rah megalomania clip the label "remastered" even though it had been mastered like 3-4 years earlier. The point is that some people make it out as they did a grand remaster on the video and I still don't understand where did the term cone into use this time. But we're not talking about the amount of work that has been done. We're talking about the fact that you don't seem to think mastering original material again(without the involvement of the first, old master) is "remastering". At least that's what you said. No idea what you're saying with the Megalomania argument. Are you saying that it was mastered 3-4 years earlier...and then again for the christmas present? Why was it mastered 3-4 years earlier and for what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted December 25, 2013 Share Posted December 25, 2013 Were people using "remastered" when talking about video though? I always assumed they were talking about audio. Yeah I'm pretty sure everyone but Jazzthief is talking about the audio. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzthief Posted December 25, 2013 Share Posted December 25, 2013 But we're not talking about the amount of work that has been done. We're talking about the fact that you don't seem to think mastering original material again(without the involvement of the first, old master) is "remastering". At least that's what you said. No idea what you're saying with the Megalomania argument. Are you saying that it was mastered 3-4 years earlier...and then again for the christmas present? Why was it mastered 3-4 years earlier and for what? I understand that mastering an old master again is remastering and that's the literal meaning of it. But maybe you people are talking about the audio in which case, as I have mentioned earlier, I agree, as the audio does sound very good. Well, we've had Fury and the behind the sceenes clip showcased some footage that at least gave me the impression that they have shot and edited the whole gig. Don't know why they didn't release it though, probably cause they had released haarp earlier that year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted December 25, 2013 Share Posted December 25, 2013 Well, we've had Fury and the behind the sceenes clip showcased some footage that at least gave me the impression that they have shot and edited the whole gig. Don't know why they didn't release it though, probably cause they had released haarp earlier that year. But if they had shot and edited the whole gig(probably more likely that they just edited the song they released but anyway), what makes you say it was REmastered? What has pointed towards the fact that they redid anything for the xmas present if it had already been edited years earlier? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzthief Posted December 25, 2013 Share Posted December 25, 2013 But if they had shot and edited the whole gig(probably more likely that they just edited the song they released but anyway), what makes you say it was REmastered? What has pointed towards the fact that they redid anything for the xmas present if it had already been edited years earlier? The same question can be applied to this year's Christmas present. What exactly indicates that it has been retreated in any way, video or audio? The audio does sound very good, and as you already pointed out: people were talking about the audio all along - my bad - which might have been remastered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted December 25, 2013 Share Posted December 25, 2013 The same question can be applied to this year's Christmas present. What exactly indicates that it has been retreated in any way, video or audio? The audio does sound very good, and as you already pointed out: people were talking about the audio all along - my bad - which might have been remastered. But in the case of the Hysteria performance, we have something to compare to. In the case of Megalomania, we don't. So no, the same question can't be applied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzthief Posted December 25, 2013 Share Posted December 25, 2013 But in the case of the Hysteria performance, we have something to compare to. In the case of Megalomania, we don't. So no, the same question can't be applied. Oh come on, the Hysteria video is a leaked mess, obviously not intended to be that way and not the source material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frozenbanana Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 why can't someone just leak proshot showbiz from the same gig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Why can't someone just leak every recorded performance ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopix Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Why can't someone just leak every recorded performance ever. Starting with Zepp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabriPav Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Why can't they leak Live at Rome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Starting with Zepp. I was gonna say "followed by" but tbh I can't really think of any other gig I really want. I guess some of the ones from the BH&R tour when they went crazy with the setlists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will_ Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Full RAH would be cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frozenbanana Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 I was gonna say "followed by" but tbh I can't really think of any other gig I really want. I guess some of the ones from the BH&R tour when they went crazy with the setlists. What proshot live footage/audio people want might not be a bad subject for a thread, actually (though it is kinda tied up with the "what do people want for christmas presents" stuff...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzthief Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 [YT]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BhVe6lafRw[/YT] About 10 seconds of Take A Bow there starting at 3:49. Did not know about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabriPav Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 That's 23 seconds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schweppes Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Megalomania from RAH, that was a good christmas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzthief Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 That's 23 seconds Still pretty awesome. Watching the three videos of the gig that are on youtube... mindblowing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clunge Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 I woz 'derr . Such a good gig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzthief Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 I woz 'derr . Such a good gig. I'm incredibly jealous. Dat atmosphere... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gocanux Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Any clue why some of us in the US didn't receive this email? I have been on the mailing list since 2004 and usually receive all of them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mskatie Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Any clue why some of us in the US didn't receive this email? I have been on the mailing list since 2004 and usually receive all of them... No idea. I never get them so I just have to wait for it to get posted on the website. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serpentsatellite Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Same here... I never get the emails, and I've been signed up (on both of my emails) since at least '05. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted December 26, 2013 Share Posted December 26, 2013 Yeah I never got the email this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now