Acoustic Album????

[FabriPav]

I never even hinted at the fact that a Muse acoustic album would be good. As always, you don't understand.

[MyChemGd1234]

comon hug each other! an muse accoustic album would be hm not that cool... electric guitars are cooler...

[mskatie]

comon hug each other! an muse accoustic album would be hm not that cool... electric guitars are cooler...

 

Off topic, but do you know your sig says "Building Light"?

[kueller]

Off topic, but do you know your sig says "Building Light"?

 

It actually says Buliding Light

[mskatie]

It actually says Buliding Light

 

Indeed it does.

[MyChemGd1234]

was meant to say building light... iPhone-auto-correction corrected it 2 times like this, so i wrote it 2 times wrong... now this song is called building light for me...

[Jobby]

You can't even explain why an acoustic Muse album would be that good. Why do you want it more than a fucking rock album heh?

 

Oh dear

[LiT]

I never even hinted at the fact that a Muse acoustic album would be good. As always, you don't understand.

 

But I do.You think acoustic is not dull at all. And think I'm wrong.

Now you're supposed to defend acoustic and support Muse to make one.

Edited October 28, 2013 by LiT

[Hat]

But I do.You think acoustic is not dull at all. And think I'm wrong.

Now you're supposed to defend acoustic and support Muse to make one.

(barely acoustic, but like Muse would ever do a strictly acoustic album anyway)

[Hat]

And last but absolutely not least: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D244ppeSmZE&t=2m

[Bumpypotato]

Muse wouldn't do a technical math-acoustic album:rolleyes:

 

Also a full acoustic album would mean they'd gone even softer than lately. And suddenly Muse is an acoustic pop band.

 

Um... All of this post is bollocks.

[Jobby]

I'd say Nature_1, Map Of Your Head and Shine (Acoustic) are pretty good examples of Muse being able to pull off acoustic well.

 

Edit: Posting this has made me remember how lovely MOYH is

Edited October 29, 2013 by Jobby

[kojane]

And last but absolutely not least: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D244ppeSmZE&t=2m

 

Damn, that's awesome.

[Bumpypotato]

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nY7GnAq6Znw

 

Omg acoustic is so boring.

[Bs]

was meant to say building light... iPhone-auto-correction corrected it 2 times like this, so i wrote it 2 times wrong... now this song is called building light for me...

 

Golden!

[Hat]

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nY7GnAq6Znw

 

Omg acoustic is so boring.

Damn, definitely gonna check him out further.

[FabriPav]

Guys why would you want dull soulless boring acoustic pop music over rawk, c'mon stop it.

[LiT]

It's all good what you showed. But can't imagine Muse make acoustic interesting.

It would be probably a song similar to Starlight but with acoustic guitar. So no technical acoustic.

[Hat]

It's all good what you showed. But can't imagine Muse make acoustic interesting.

It would be probably a song similar to Starlight but with acoustic guitar. So no technical acoustic.

That's not what you said though but okay.

 

Also like the way you use "so" like you just made a deduction out of pure speculation.

[Jobby]

It's all good what you showed. But can't imagine Muse make acoustic interesting.

 

Nature_1.

 

It would be probably a song similar to Starlight but with acoustic guitar.

 

Screenager.

 

So no technical acoustic.

 

Bedroom Acoustics.

[Hat]

Nature_1.

 

 

 

Screenager.

 

 

 

Bedroom Acoustics.

BUT THEY'RE NOT THAT BAND ANYMORE. Now they just write simple songs like Starlight.

 

...and Supremacy.

 

and Animals.

 

and Assassin.

[Bumpypotato]

So why does it matter if the music is 'technical' or not?

[FabriPav]

So why does it matter if the music is 'technical' or not?

 

Because simple music is so boring. :stunned: :stunned:

[kueller]

:stunned: :stunned:

 

[Peter.]

Because simple music is so boring. :stunned: :stunned:

 

not necessarily, but it has a higher chance of being boring.