Anxyous Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Yeah, that. I haven't noticed anything else offensive that he's posted, hence why all the talk has been about the willy head post. Maybe I've just missed it but it does seem that that has solely gotten him the ban, and for a few days now not a single mod has apparently managed to clarify to us or even to him what the other reasons were? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bumpypotato Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I'm tempted to say both but Noodles is such a bro How do some of them resist the descent into cuntery with power? And Jessica is such a lovely person too maybe they were just cunts to begin with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabriPav Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Knew it, Al's post got deleted and no one answered him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I've answered that at least twice in this thread. Continued unpleasant behaviour, warned that any further offences will end in a ban. In the opinion of the mod team, an offence was carried out. Therefore ban. He's lucky he didn't get a perma after registering a new account, I would have done this, other people in the team disagreed.But according to the mod team, it wasn't the post containing the word "gay" that got him the infraction, at least not that post alone. So we still have no idea what he actually said that got him banned, and neither does he. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabriPav Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I've answered that at least twice in this thread. Continued unpleasant behaviour Any examples? Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bumpypotato Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Yeah, that. I haven't noticed anything else offensive that he's posted, hence why all the talk has been about the willy head post. Maybe I've just missed it but it does seem that that has solely gotten him the ban, and for a few days now not a single mod has apparently managed to clarify to us or even to him what the other reasons were? Basically, proof or it didn't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I've answered that at least twice in this thread. Continued unpleasant behaviour, warned that any further offences will end in a ban. In the opinion of the mod team, an offence was carried out. Therefore ban. He's lucky he didn't get a perma after registering a new account, I would have done this, other people in the team disagreed. continued unpleasant behaviour as in the willy head post or more, because no one else seems to be aware of anything else although some mods are then saying that there was more and it's all a little confusing I think him making the whole dupe is a bit silly, but since he doesn't seem to care anymore how long his ban is oh well Out of curiosity, when you're banned is it still possible to message mods? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 when you're banned is it still possible to message mods?Yes, through email. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 continued unpleasant behaviour as in the willy head post or more, because no one else seems to be aware of anything else although some mods are then saying that there was more and it's all a little confusing I think him making the whole dupe is a bit silly, but since he doesn't seem to care anymore how long his ban is oh well Out of curiosity, when you're banned is it still possible to message mods? You can't even get to see why you're banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legit Queen Blee Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I'm looking right now at the warning he recieved on his first day back after a ban when he posted - Muse boards suck my dick faggots. Original post here - http://board.muse.mu/showthread.php?p=10014338 He was told then that any further offences would result in a permaban. He offended, was given a 12 month ban. Is still apparently crying about it. He was absolutely told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bumpypotato Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I can't help but feel that any other derogatory term used would have had a much more lenient reaction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Yes, through email. Coming from a true veteran of the banhammer You can't even get to see why you're banned. I've only seen the screen where you get banned once and that was a while ago now after I had a dupe account that got banned...although technically I had that one first and forgot about it and this account is the dupe account so really this one should've been banned but who knows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I'm looking right now at the warning he recieved on his first day back after a ban when he posted - Original post here - http://board.muse.mu/showthread.php?p=10014338 He was told then that any further offences would result in a permaban. He offended, was given a 12 month ban. Is still apparently crying about it. He was absolutely told. Ahhhhhhhhhh, see now it makes a little more sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legit Queen Blee Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I can't help but feel that any other derogatory term used would have had a much more lenient reaction. Nope. This hasn't been the case in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banksy. Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 BOD, while your post was obviously ironic please don't undermine your points with hollow threats of violence. The fact this whole conversation exists is ridiculous. It isn't tenable to host such a conversation every single time someone gets banned and their besties come complaining as a matter of practicality. Does obvious irony matter or not then? As someone who doesn't know either the poster this was originally about or BOD I think it's fairly easy to tell which one is "obviously" ironic (I'll give a hint; it isn't BOD's). Maybe the fact that the conversation exists is more of a reflection upon the action taken than the people complaining, you shouldn't be so solipsistic. Just because most of the people here seem to be somewhat servile in one way or another surely doesn't mean that the whole board should be, although maybe from the perspective of a moderator that would be preferable. I don't really think it's worth arguing about any more after the recent post made on the other page which clearly broke several board rules and was a pretty silly thing to do though, unless people regard it as a matter of principle I certainly shouldn't think that he'll be coming back here after that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I'm looking right now at the warning he recieved on his first day back after a ban when he posted - Original post here - http://board.muse.mu/showthread.php?p=10014338 He was told then that any further offences would result in a permaban. He offended, was given a 12 month ban. Is still apparently crying about it. He was absolutely told. Well then, I don't want to sound condescending(I promise, I really don't) but that wasn't so hard, was it? He said something similar to what got me an infraction just a while back, was warned, then said something more. Thus explaining what the mods and admins have been going on about here by saying "several cases of unpleasant conduct" but without specifying. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Oh also that link brings back mmrz, did Tom get any infractions for the whole shenanigans that followed that? Cos he definitely should have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legit Queen Blee Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Does obvious irony matter or not then? As someone who doesn't know either the poster this was originally about or BOD I think it's fairly easy to tell which one is "obviously" ironic (I'll give a hint; it isn't BOD's). Maybe the fact that the conversation exists is more of a reflection upon the action taken than the people complaining, you shouldn't be so solipsistic. Just because most of the people here seem to be somewhat servile in one way or another surely doesn't mean that the whole board should be, although maybe from the perspective of a moderator that would be preferable. Yes, we are absolutely expecting everyone to be servile, which is why we locked this thread, and banned everyone disagreeing with us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabriPav Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Oh also that link brings back mmrz, did Tom get any infractions for the whole shenanigans that followed that? Cos he definitely should have Well, no one reported him... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic. Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Well, no one reported him... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I'll go do that now maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frakkles Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 He got a warning for calling Will a pussy. Although... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hat Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 I'll go do that now maybe Watch out, I got a warning for "clearly only reporting someone to get back at them and not because you were offended....despite what they said being against the rules". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FabriPav Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Watch out, I got a warning for "clearly only reporting someone to get back at them and not because you were offended....despite what they said being against the rules". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anxyous Posted June 17, 2013 Share Posted June 17, 2013 Watch out, I got a warning for "clearly only reporting someone to get back at them and not because you were offended....despite what they said being against the rules". Yeah, you can't get offended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.