Jump to content

Jabnit

Members
  • Posts

    268
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jabnit

  1. I did mention -1 to the guy but he still hasn't replied yet after a week! he must be real busy though which i respect cuz he's friendly and seems to know what he's doing
  2. i aint heard anything from the guy who's making it for ages. so i'm real curious over the pedal. i still need to hear some demos. should sound okay hopefuly. maybe he's making it top notch before he lets me know hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
  3. other people have posted demo's of it just shifting +1 and it sounds fine. not bothered about getting the motp effect anyway. i just wana do some step sequence material. the only reason i mentioned motp to the guy building it was so he gets a real good idea of what i want.
  4. -1 on the circuit would be inconvinient tbf. I have asked if I can have an on/off for each step.
  5. This is the closest sound I got using Power Tab Editor. I got the tab from the book. It's hard to play on guitar so I put it in power tab and doubled the required BPM and it worked. download so if i shown that diagram that hypnotize posted to my pedal luthier would it make sense to him and help achieve the circuit?
  6. Sounds that way on the album but live it only sounds like 1+ then the original note.
  7. What Matt said in the forign Guitarist interview (sequenced amps, each set on different octaves) or the Whammy > MIDI thing on your PC that Haze demonstrated.
  8. So he sequences amps set at different pitches. What are these pitches? It only seems to track up 1 octave then back down so why bother using a load of amps?
  9. Just read a description. Looks as if it would do the trick. £445 though... So again it's a waste of money just to acheive one effect. Although it looks as if it can do many other useful things too. I don't think it has been mentioned before.
  10. I apolagize. Forum = Helpful. No you shut up. Atleast the other people who take the piss have been on here since day one. You have just walked in to join the fun.
  11. omg piss off My mate keeps his pedals at my house which I am welcome to use. When I get my Whammy I will be able able to use two. They're too expensive to get two of my own. Did you not think to question the guy who actually has two Whammy's? Didn't think so. Fucking forum.
  12. Digitech Whammy and a MIDI Sequencer Can you get the step effect using Logic Edication and a Whammy?
  13. "BPM effect function with flexible BPM detection" "Twenty types of BPM effect can be synchronized to the tempo of your music to control delay time or the pan, phaser, or flanger LFO. Of these, eight can synchronize a rhythm pattern or synth bass to the BPM, and play it from the touch pad. You can set the BPM manually, use Auto BPM to detect it from an input source, use the Tap Tempo function to set the BPM by pressing the Tap key, or control BPM from incoming MIDI Clock messages".
  14. That's what i thought it was a while back. But that demo is a delay effect surely.
  15. That wasn't my point. I was just saying that most people/n00bs? only want this effect to do this paticular song or just show off as Raurie just suggested. That was me tbh but now I don't give a shit. I know you can do more with a sequencer and that your able to use them with more than just a whammy pedal but some people just want a sequencer and whammy to get that paticular effect and then they probably wont have a clue what else to achieve with the sequencer (this is why I don't care anymore, lol). Where as some people like maybe yourself and Raurie want to experiment with the effect. True. It goes the smae for a lot of other effects that Matt uses really. Like when some people wonder how Matt acheives the PIB intro then they get a FF and expect to sound like Matt.
  16. Yeah. I was obsessed with this effect scince I heard the song and looked into it. Now I look back and think, "what a n00b / Matt-wanabe". Not that intrested anymore. I can wait.
  17. True. I can get a decent effect rocking back and forth on my mates whammy pedal but I must be honest and say it gets very tiring and unaccurate after a while But for those of you who have no access to neither a whammy or a sequencer, it does seem a little bit of an expensive buy just to do the intro to a song. This is why I would rather settle with a simple pedal, such as the Digitech Flanger or just fuck it and keep to the whammy. I don't like the idea of attaching another pedal to my board just to do one song in my position tbh.
  18. +1 with the recommended pedals! Using a sequencer with a whammy just seems to be more money and hassle to me. Atleast I've heard the Digitech Flanger and it sounds great. Surely if you use that with loads of distortion you wouldn't even here the flange depth so much. I have a phaser and when the depth is low and I use distortion you can only just tell it's a phaser. I think I should go to Birmingham soon and try out some pedals
×
×
  • Create New...